Deutsch Politik Geschichte Kunst Film Musik Lebensart Reisen
English Politics History Art Film Music Lifestyle Travel
Français Politique Histoire Arts Film Musique Artdevivre Voyages

Index  Advertise  Werbung  Links  Feedback
© Copyright  Louis Gerber  All rights reserved.

Why President Obama has failed
Article added on January 11, 2012 at 14:13 Swiss time
After three years in power, it is time to assess President Obama's first term.

Economic and financial policy

On the economic front, Obama's record is weak. The moral hazard situation in the financial sector remains. Gains still get privatized, losses socialized and fraud such as selling junk mortgages as secure securities has no legal consequences. Glass-Steagall is just one keyword in this economic field. The government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have not been dismantled; as I wrote in September 2008:
“There is no need for the state to be active in the housing market.” My advice of January 2009 remains: “Split up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into 1000 companies.”

The leading banks are fewer, bigger and as intertwined as before the crisis. The stimulus did of course not stimulate the economy. The deficit remains out of control. The public debt of the United States keeps rising. The unemployment rate has been improving lately, but still stands at 8.5% (with of course many people having left the job search and therefore being no longer counted among the jobless).

Only the auto industry intervention
paid off (for people working for GM). It remains a shady action to help Obama's trade union buddies mainly at General Motors. Chrysler is now by 58.5% owned by Fiat. Ford, the one company not “rescued” by the Obama Administration, is doing best. As a result of the state intervention, GM got rid of its debt. The GM pension claims remain a shady affair. Competition has been biased. The state intervened to save a specific company in a specific sector. Would the free market not have been able to solve the problem!?

Pork barrel and (e.g. agricultural) subsidies remain a problem. So does political campaign financing, but that's another story...

Health care policy

Obama needed to show to his own voters and lawmakers that he can deliver. ObamaCare was that bill, a giant one outlined on some 2000 pages. The probably correct claim is that some 30 million previously uninsured people got (or will get) health care insurance. But at what price? The president's claim that the overall health care cost in the United States would be lower thanks to ObamaCare is a fairy tale. It is another nail in the public deficit and debt coffin. As outlined in April 2010, it is not the end of market driven health care. Already beofore, there was not enough transparency and competition between doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical and health insurance companies. There were already state-sponsored insurance plans (Medicare, Medicaid). But the new bill was a step towards more state control without effective cost control measures. Obama promised the impossible, mainly health care for more people, but cost-neutral, without thinning services and reducing benefits for people already insured (Medicaid). The truth of the matter is that with the new (European-style) bill, health care will become more expensive in the United States.

Great American Songbook sheet music - Special offers on

Foreign and military policy

On the foreign and military policy front, President Obama can refer to a few successes: The killing of Osama bin Laden and the end of the US occupation of Iraq. Blunders include the 2009-Afghan presidential election, where Karzai was able to get away with a rigged election. The timid reaction to the brutally repressed revolt in Iran and Hillary Clinton's support for Mubarak, when it was already clear that the autocrats days in power were numbered, are among the not so fine hours of Obama's foreign policy.

Human rights policy and Guantanamo

Ten years ago, the Guantanamo prison opened and quickly became the symbol of a failed torture and human rights violation strategy. During his presidential campaign, Obama had said that he would close the prison immediately. At the beginning of his first and hopefully only term, Obama disposed of a Democratic majority in both Houses of Parliament. Despite all his claims and good intentions, he has not managed to close Guantanamo, which holds still 171 prisoners. Not only did the “Messiah” fail to overcome resistance in Congress regarding Guantanamo, but military tribunals resumed and, on December 31, Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act, which allows indefinite military detention without trial.

Obama rightly repealed Don't Ask, Don't Tell because, as the president said and wrote: “Our military can no longer be deprived of the talents and skills of Americans just because they happen to be gay or lesbian.” It's a matter of “justice and equality”.

In June 2011, Vietnam and the United States began taking first steps towards cleaning up Agent Orange contamination in Vietnam. Dioxin, Napalm and Agent Orange were used by the U.S. military in the jungle wars in Vietnam from 1961 to 1971. Five years ago, in 2007, efforts by the U.S. embassy began to focus on cleaning up dioxin polluted areas. Obama is not involved in a high level effort, but his administration continues on the path embarked by the previous ones to come clean with the dirty war past, one of the darkest chapters in American history.

Environmental and energy policy

Obama's dealing with the oil-spill in the Gulf of Mexico was rather incompetent. Government oversight was a joke. Obama himself had allowed the deep water drilling.

Obama's global-warming and pollution fighting policies are unconvincing. He promised a lot and has not delivered. After the Tsunami in Japan and the nuclear disaster which followed, Obama has not decided to check the security of the US nuclear plants, some of which are in California, where a major earthquake is overdue. Obama has decided to hold on to nuclear energy. He is surely right not to panic like Angela Merkel. But a new risk assessment and the funding of fundamental research regarding alternative, renewable energies are vital for both the American environment and economy.

Instead, the Obama administration subsidized solar energy, with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Solyndra being this policy's major “achievement”. In 2009, the US Department of Energy gave a $535 million loan to Solyndra, which also received a $25.1 million tax break form California's Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority; Solyndra investors and executives contributed reportedly between $50,000 and $100,000 to Obama's presidential campaign.

November 2012 outlook

As Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney rightly said: “This President doesn't understand how the economy works.” He added: “It's time to get a president who does”. Of course, that man is Mitt himself, who said after the New Hampshire primary, that Obama wants to turn the US into a European style welfare state.

Romney surely flip-flopped, partly to pander to the Republican right. He once wanted to double Guantanamo. He is not a white knight. But Obama not only pandered to the left of the Democrats. He is a social-democrat. His first term could have been worse. But it is far from glorious. Everything is relative. In times of economic and financial trouble, Romney is the better man than Obama to lead the United States (check the
New Hampshire and Iowa articles on Romney).

The 2012 presidential election may well be decided by the latest job numbers and the latest growth rate figures known on election day. But the fact remains that the president is a dilettante who does not deliver much more than colorful speeches. Make Obama a one-term president!

Today's deals at - Great American Songbook sheet music

Deutsch Politik Geschichte Kunst Film Musik Lebensart Reisen
English Politics History Art Film Music Lifestyle Travel
Français Politique Histoire Arts Film Musique Artdevivre Voyages

Index  Advertise  Werbung  Links  Feedback
© Copyright  Louis Gerber  All rights reserved.